FundingPips Reviews

It's a great platform for beginner traders, but the support and customer service leave something to be desired, as everything is automated through a chatbot when beginner traders need that human interaction. It did help me get through that beginner trading stage.

This is a good propfirm i have used very friendly interface and execution and rules are good no hidden rules only one is floating drawdown is not good

I recently received a payout from Funding Pips, and the entire process was smooth and professional from start to finish. After meeting the trading requirements, I submitted my payout request and was impressed by how quickly it was processed. There were no hidden issues, delays, or unnecessary complications. The rules were clear, and as long as you stick to proper risk management and consistency, getting paid is straightforward. What stood out to me most was the transparency and reliability of the platform—they delivered exactly what they promised. The dashboard is easy to use, and tracking progress toward payouts is simple. Overall, my experience has been very positive, and it has increased my confidence in trading with them. I would definitely recommend Funding Pips to traders who are disciplined and serious about growing their accounts and earning consistent payouts.

Just passed my Phase 1 with funding pips. So. far it's been a good experience. I see other reviews about slippage but I haven't personally experienced this problem. I'll definitely be purchasing another account with them once this one is passed.

My experience with Funded Pips has been decent, especially for traders looking to get started with funded accounts. One of the main advantages is the relatively simple evaluation process. Compared to some other prop firms, the rules are easier to follow, making it beginner-friendly. The pricing is also competitive, which is great if you don’t want to risk too much upfront. However, there are some concerns. The reputation of newer prop firms like Funded Pips is still developing, so trust and long-term reliability can be a question. Payout speed and consistency may also vary depending on user experiences. On the positive side, their platform is smooth, and the trading conditions are generally acceptable. Overall, Funded Pips is a good option for beginners, but I would recommend starting small and testing the firm before going all in.

For context: I am a profitable trader with a clean record at the two most respected firms in the industry. I have been paid out over $110k with one firm and over $80k with another firm, both without any issues whatsoever. Both of those firms are widely known for strict rule enforcement. What follows is what happened when I ran the same strategy at FundingPips. I passed three 2-Step Challenges and was scaled to a 300k merged account (the maximum allocation). I traded it to around $19,000 in realised profit and was then banned mid-trade on an open position that was on its way to a further $11,000 in profit. They forcibly closed that position at the moment of termination. Their stated evidence for banning me was a one-page document citing a single trade out of six on the account. The trade they picked was a 1 lot XAUUSD long that tapped my stop loss at 1% for a loss. Their own data on the "match" shows a 98-second gap and a $2.17 price difference with the unknown "other account." They called this a "strong indication" of "trading in concert." The words "strong" and "similar" are doing all the work in their correspondence because the actual numbers do not support a stronger word. If there were any real pattern of trading in concert, it would show across multiple trades, especially the significantly profitable ones, where a coordinating trader would have the most reason to align. No such evidence exists. They also cited 'similar IP data' as evidence. My trades were executed from my home computer on my residential internet. For another account to share that IP, someone would have to be physically in my house using my network. No such person exists. And if they're suggesting the link was through a trade copier, no copier that exists has a 98-second latency gap. I submitted a detailed written rebuttal addressing the evidence. Their response did not engage with any of it. They simply restated the decision and said the matter "does not allow for further reconsideration."

one of the best funding firms. no hidden rules, consistently gives payout without denying. Glad to have funding pips account, Actually so far not having much to mention, since I am doing level 2, After having cleared level 2 and stage comes to apply n receive draw down than can evaluate, so let's hope for the best.

My experience with FundingPips has been mixed and more difficult than expected. While the evaluation process looks simple and the rules appear clear at first, actual trading feels much more restrictive. The drawdown limits are quite tight, so even a small mistake or a few losing trades can quickly put your account at risk. This creates constant pressure and makes it hard to trade naturally or confidently, especially for traders who are still improving their consistency. Execution is another concern, particularly during volatile market conditions where spreads and slippage can increase and affect performance. Passing the challenge is one thing, but maintaining the funded account is much harder due to strict risk limits and limited room for recovery. Although payouts are possible, they require strict rule compliance. Overall, it’s not a scam, but it’s not as easy as advertised and is better suited for disciplined traders.

I successfully passed both evaluation phases and was granted a $50K master account. On my first trades, I took a position with a calculated risk of 1.96%, clearly below the stated 2% maximum risk per trade. However, after the trade was closed, commissions were added, pushing my total loss to 2.01% — just $7.03 over the limit — and my account was immediately terminated for a “hard breach.” Here’s the issue: at no point in their publicly available rules or guidelines did they clearly state that commissions are included in the maximum risk calculation. This is critical information for risk management, and without transparency on commission structure (such as cost per lot), it’s impossible to accurately control total risk. When I contacted support, instead of acknowledging the lack of clarity, they referred to a screenshot of a rule that was never explicitly presented in their official documentation. Terminating an account over a $7 difference — caused by undisclosed commission handling — is not just strict, it’s unreasonable. At the very least, this should have been treated as a soft breach, especially given that the trade itself was planned within the stated risk parameters. Traders rely on clear, transparent rules to manage risk. Hidden conditions or unclear cost structures undermine trust and put traders at a disadvantage. I strongly advise others to be cautious and to fully clarify how commissions impact risk limits before trading with this firm.

I have been trading with FundingPips for almost 3 years. During this time, I have had multiple accounts fail, but I never complained or questioned their system because I always believed in taking responsibility for my own mistakes. Yesterday morning, while trading on my Master account, my account was suddenly closed. I received an email stating that I had violated the 3% rule and that my account had been terminated. However, the trades in question were actually opened the previous day. My account size was $25,000, and the 3% limit was $750. I was carefully monitoring my dashboard and managing my risk accordingly. I even kept a buffer of around $125 and closed all my trades to stay within the limit. Even now, my dashboard still shows a total loss of only around $625. I tried reaching out via email but did not receive any response. then i contacted support through the website, but I kept receiving the same repeated message about the 3% rule, without any proper explanation related to my specific situation. I also contacted support via WhatsApp. Although my messages were acknowledged, the replies felt repetitive and did not address my concerns. I even requested them to create a ticket and forward my case to the risk management team, but I kept receiving the same standard response. Honestly, it felt like I was speaking with an AI assistant rather than a real support team. This account was very important for me, which is why I reached out to their support team for the first time. Unfortunately, I did not receive the level of support I expected.